<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QuickBooks Online apologies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/06/17/quickbooks-online-apologies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/06/17/quickbooks-online-apologies/</link>
	<description>QuickBooks Online Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 05:28:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/06/17/quickbooks-online-apologies/#comment-2779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=869#comment-2779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marilyn Glendenning offered: &quot;...customers didn’t get paid!&quot; Maybe Marilyn&#039;s problem is, you&#039;re not supposed to pay customers, they&#039;re supposed to pay YOU.;-) Keith Says: &quot;I AM PRETTY SURE THAT QUICKBOOKS/INTUIT IS A TERRORIST ATTACH [sic]...THEY ARE THE SAME PEOPLE WORKING TOGETHER. DOES ANYONE AGREE WITH ME ON THIS.&quot; Only other lunatic conspiracy theorists, Keith. Jay identified that. What a bunch of whiners. At most, QBOL should comp the days they were down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marilyn Glendenning offered: &#8220;&#8230;customers didn’t get paid!&#8221; Maybe Marilyn&#8217;s problem is, you&#8217;re not supposed to pay customers, they&#8217;re supposed to pay YOU.;-) Keith Says: &#8220;I AM PRETTY SURE THAT QUICKBOOKS/INTUIT IS A TERRORIST ATTACH [sic]&#8230;THEY ARE THE SAME PEOPLE WORKING TOGETHER. DOES ANYONE AGREE WITH ME ON THIS.&#8221; Only other lunatic conspiracy theorists, Keith. Jay identified that. What a bunch of whiners. At most, QBOL should comp the days they were down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/06/17/quickbooks-online-apologies/#comment-2268</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=869#comment-2268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I too am not satisfied with the online version of QB. I have much more freedom (within QB) using my desktop version than the online version. My accountant feels the same way about QB. I have long item codes that I need to see (as well as my customers)but to my knowledge QBO does not offer any adjustments. I sit here debating about calling my accountant and &quot;Paying&quot; her to switch me back to desktop version. I was hoping for so much more when switching to the QBO but met with disappointment!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am not satisfied with the online version of QB. I have much more freedom (within QB) using my desktop version than the online version. My accountant feels the same way about QB. I have long item codes that I need to see (as well as my customers)but to my knowledge QBO does not offer any adjustments. I sit here debating about calling my accountant and &#8220;Paying&#8221; her to switch me back to desktop version. I was hoping for so much more when switching to the QBO but met with disappointment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/06/17/quickbooks-online-apologies/#comment-1894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=869#comment-1894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and don&#039;t forget tin foil Keith.  They&#039;re going to use that to create mind control hats for us. STOP BUYING TIN FOIL!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and don&#8217;t forget tin foil Keith.  They&#8217;re going to use that to create mind control hats for us. STOP BUYING TIN FOIL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/06/17/quickbooks-online-apologies/#comment-1893</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=869#comment-1893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TYPO:  ATTACK]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TYPO:  ATTACK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/06/17/quickbooks-online-apologies/#comment-1892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=869#comment-1892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I AM PRETTY SURE THAT QUICKBOOKS/INTUIT IS A TERRORIST ATTACH IN THE MAKING.  PLEASE PLEASE STOP USING THERE PRODUCTS.  ALSO, IF YOU HAVE A NETGEAR ROUTER GET RID OF THAT AS WELL. THEY ARE THE SAME PEOPLE WORKING TOGETHER.  DOES ANYONE AGREE WITH ME ON THIS.  THEY ARE CONTROLLING OUR COUNTRIES TECHNOLOGY AND OUR MONEY.  I AM AFRAID OF WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO OUR COUNTRY THIS TIME WHEN THEY SUCCEED WITH WHAT IT IS THAT THEY ARE WORKING ON.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I AM PRETTY SURE THAT QUICKBOOKS/INTUIT IS A TERRORIST ATTACH IN THE MAKING.  PLEASE PLEASE STOP USING THERE PRODUCTS.  ALSO, IF YOU HAVE A NETGEAR ROUTER GET RID OF THAT AS WELL. THEY ARE THE SAME PEOPLE WORKING TOGETHER.  DOES ANYONE AGREE WITH ME ON THIS.  THEY ARE CONTROLLING OUR COUNTRIES TECHNOLOGY AND OUR MONEY.  I AM AFRAID OF WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO OUR COUNTRY THIS TIME WHEN THEY SUCCEED WITH WHAT IT IS THAT THEY ARE WORKING ON.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/06/17/quickbooks-online-apologies/#comment-1735</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=869#comment-1735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your entire site, including your main site, is down again.  It is time to admit that your service is not up to the availability level that an accounting package should maintain.  Please tell me what plans you have, if any, to get to that point.  I would like to make an informed decision on when and if I switch from quickbooks online.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your entire site, including your main site, is down again.  It is time to admit that your service is not up to the availability level that an accounting package should maintain.  Please tell me what plans you have, if any, to get to that point.  I would like to make an informed decision on when and if I switch from quickbooks online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Plante</title>
		<link>http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/06/17/quickbooks-online-apologies/#comment-1729</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy Plante]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=869#comment-1729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So much for sorry. The site is down again. Just went down 5 minutes ago. 

This is rediculous!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much for sorry. The site is down again. Just went down 5 minutes ago. </p>
<p>This is rediculous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Hiranandaney</title>
		<link>http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/06/17/quickbooks-online-apologies/#comment-1594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Hiranandaney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=869#comment-1594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Suchi:

I have been with QB for 15 years, first as desktop user and then QB Online.  We added a total of four companies and I am disappointed with this outage and of earlier similar outages.  We are a vocational training college and without data, we were so helpless and during this period lost over $100,000 in cash collections and now this month we will be off our target.  Even though we will be able to recover it eventually but loss of cash flow now is devastating.  Four years ago, we were dumped by your payroll service as you folks conveniently got out of Complete payroll business and now we have to repeat the entire payroll from the third party provider to QB online again and it is very slow to respond.  Also over a period of time, the service has become very slow and have in the past few years talking to number of tech’s who could not tell me the reason why, they said they might have to move us to a different cluster (we don’t know this lingo), finally only in October last year;  one tech told me that we have outgrown this service as QB online cannot handle our large data file.  We told them to suggest us something in the hosted environment, but different sales reps since Nov have left the ball several times.  I am seriously considering Microsoft Great Plains, they are offering three licenses for $1 promotion, only from second year we pay maintenance, and their system seems more robust.  You have to give me a serious reason why our four companies should continue to be users of QB and if there is a compelling reason, how QB Enterprise Desktop version will match against MS GP accounting software which can integrate with whole host of vendors for payroll/banking/CRM etc?

Sam Hiranandaney, President]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Suchi:</p>
<p>I have been with QB for 15 years, first as desktop user and then QB Online.  We added a total of four companies and I am disappointed with this outage and of earlier similar outages.  We are a vocational training college and without data, we were so helpless and during this period lost over $100,000 in cash collections and now this month we will be off our target.  Even though we will be able to recover it eventually but loss of cash flow now is devastating.  Four years ago, we were dumped by your payroll service as you folks conveniently got out of Complete payroll business and now we have to repeat the entire payroll from the third party provider to QB online again and it is very slow to respond.  Also over a period of time, the service has become very slow and have in the past few years talking to number of tech’s who could not tell me the reason why, they said they might have to move us to a different cluster (we don’t know this lingo), finally only in October last year;  one tech told me that we have outgrown this service as QB online cannot handle our large data file.  We told them to suggest us something in the hosted environment, but different sales reps since Nov have left the ball several times.  I am seriously considering Microsoft Great Plains, they are offering three licenses for $1 promotion, only from second year we pay maintenance, and their system seems more robust.  You have to give me a serious reason why our four companies should continue to be users of QB and if there is a compelling reason, how QB Enterprise Desktop version will match against MS GP accounting software which can integrate with whole host of vendors for payroll/banking/CRM etc?</p>
<p>Sam Hiranandaney, President</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Phelan</title>
		<link>http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/06/17/quickbooks-online-apologies/#comment-1557</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Phelan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 04:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=869#comment-1557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the product manager put up the first round of apologies, I sent over the following note:

To all of you at QuickBooks Online:

You should all be ashamed of yourselves.  

We have been with this product for more than 4 years, and it has always been obvious that you treated QBOE as a poor stepchild to the desktop version.  I only expected that you were running this product on a redundant basis across multiple data centers.  What is super clear, based upon our experience for the last 3 days, is that you were NOT running this across multiple data centers, and it is all in one data center that went down. 

And this is the way you run your business? 

And this is the way you have placed key data for my business at risk?

I am going to start hunting for a new solution immediately.  You are selfish and reckless with the core data I entrusted to you to run my business, and you have destroyed our ability to place trust in you.

Update...I have not gotten any sort of reply.  We pay over 1,200 writers on a monthly basis, and this caused major disruptions to our business.  The more important issue they have NOT addressed is that it is quite clear that if there is a power failure in a single location and that takes the system down, there is no redundancy across at least one data center in a separate geographic location.  If you do NOT have this feature, than they have been playing fast and loose with the key data that we run our business with, and there is no second copy.  Very poor response to the crisis they have caused all of us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the product manager put up the first round of apologies, I sent over the following note:</p>
<p>To all of you at QuickBooks Online:</p>
<p>You should all be ashamed of yourselves.  </p>
<p>We have been with this product for more than 4 years, and it has always been obvious that you treated QBOE as a poor stepchild to the desktop version.  I only expected that you were running this product on a redundant basis across multiple data centers.  What is super clear, based upon our experience for the last 3 days, is that you were NOT running this across multiple data centers, and it is all in one data center that went down. </p>
<p>And this is the way you run your business? </p>
<p>And this is the way you have placed key data for my business at risk?</p>
<p>I am going to start hunting for a new solution immediately.  You are selfish and reckless with the core data I entrusted to you to run my business, and you have destroyed our ability to place trust in you.</p>
<p>Update&#8230;I have not gotten any sort of reply.  We pay over 1,200 writers on a monthly basis, and this caused major disruptions to our business.  The more important issue they have NOT addressed is that it is quite clear that if there is a power failure in a single location and that takes the system down, there is no redundancy across at least one data center in a separate geographic location.  If you do NOT have this feature, than they have been playing fast and loose with the key data that we run our business with, and there is no second copy.  Very poor response to the crisis they have caused all of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbi Ferraro</title>
		<link>http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/06/17/quickbooks-online-apologies/#comment-1390</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Debbi Ferraro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=869#comment-1390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agree with all of the above.  Unacceptable.  It&#039;s not the mistakes you make, but how you correct them.  &quot;I&#039;m sorry&quot;, while nice, is not enough to make up for damages suffered.  At the very &quot;least&quot; we should not have to pay for a service we didn&#039;t recieve.  Even the big bad cable companies will pro-rate if your cable is out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with all of the above.  Unacceptable.  It&#8217;s not the mistakes you make, but how you correct them.  &#8220;I&#8217;m sorry&#8221;, while nice, is not enough to make up for damages suffered.  At the very &#8220;least&#8221; we should not have to pay for a service we didn&#8217;t recieve.  Even the big bad cable companies will pro-rate if your cable is out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

