Comments on: Be the first to test out a new QuickBooks Online design! http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/05/19/be-the-first-to-test-out-a-new-quickbooks-online-design/ QuickBooks Online Blog Mon, 06 Feb 2012 05:28:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Karen Denney http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/05/19/be-the-first-to-test-out-a-new-quickbooks-online-design/#comment-3286 Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:03:25 +0000 http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=778#comment-3286 For the life of me, I can’t understand why QB will not fix the invoices where the phone numbers will automatically insert on the invoices from the Customer Center. I will never understand this. It is a total pain to have to get out of the invoice to get the phone number from Customer Center. Royal pain.

]]> By: Ken Marini http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/05/19/be-the-first-to-test-out-a-new-quickbooks-online-design/#comment-3284 Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:42:00 +0000 http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=778#comment-3284 How about the ability to customize a Sales by Product report to include customer/client contact details (email, phone, etc)? My sales guys would kill for this.

]]> By: Cynthia Patterson http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/05/19/be-the-first-to-test-out-a-new-quickbooks-online-design/#comment-2799 Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:17:13 +0000 http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=778#comment-2799 I don’t know whats going on but I am working on my quick books, use to when I changed something in the register I would save it and it would go back to the register, now I am having to go back into the register every time. So time consuming. Plus it keeps signing me out and jumping to other menus, Very Frustrated.

]]> By: Robert http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/05/19/be-the-first-to-test-out-a-new-quickbooks-online-design/#comment-2280 Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:22:59 +0000 http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=778#comment-2280 Yes, printing a packing slip seems basic for an accounting program.

]]> By: Robert http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/05/19/be-the-first-to-test-out-a-new-quickbooks-online-design/#comment-2279 Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:21:08 +0000 http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=778#comment-2279 I need a better way to integrate our shopping cart sales into QBOE. If I want to import the sales from our shopping cart provider, I have to purchase a program from an outside vendor. Tried one and the process was so complicated that our CPA finally gave up.

]]> By: Robert http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/05/19/be-the-first-to-test-out-a-new-quickbooks-online-design/#comment-2278 Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:15:27 +0000 http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=778#comment-2278 I agree with the auto-fills on the Purchase Orders. Very few businesses will order the exact same thing every time on a PO and this just adds to the chance of a mistake.

]]> By: Richard B http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/05/19/be-the-first-to-test-out-a-new-quickbooks-online-design/#comment-1691 Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:17:25 +0000 http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=778#comment-1691 Hi Roberta
I just started using the find feature in Firefox to help me find transactions in the list, doesn’t give QB a valid reason not to add a sort feature but it helps to find a transaction by name or amount.

As for not being able to edit deposits not sure because I can edit them just fine unless they have been reconciled then you have to go through more steps.

]]> By: Vitaly Kagan http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/05/19/be-the-first-to-test-out-a-new-quickbooks-online-design/#comment-800 Sat, 12 Jun 2010 00:17:41 +0000 http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=778#comment-800 How about an option to insert we accept Visa,Mastercard logo on invoices?

]]> By: Miguel http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/05/19/be-the-first-to-test-out-a-new-quickbooks-online-design/#comment-792 Wed, 09 Jun 2010 04:06:46 +0000 http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=778#comment-792 YES YES YES!!!

]]> By: Miguel http://blog.qbo.intuit.com/2010/05/19/be-the-first-to-test-out-a-new-quickbooks-online-design/#comment-791 Wed, 09 Jun 2010 04:05:02 +0000 http://blog.quickbooksonline.com/?p=778#comment-791 I agree with this one as well!

]]>